Skip to Content

The role of Customary International Law in shaping international Trade relations

The role of Customary International Law in shaping the International Trade Relations

Introduction

The “world economy is a dynamic interplay between nations, fostering trade, investment, and a complex web of financial interactions. Underlying these interactions lies a framework of rules and principles – a silent conductor orchestrating the flow of goods, services, and capital. Customary international law (CIL) serves as a cornerstone of this framework, providing a foundation for economic relations even in the absence of formal treaties.

This research project delves into the role of CIL in shaping economic relations among nations. It will explore the concept of CIL, its formation through state practice and opinio juris, and its application in key areas like trade, investment, dispute settlement, and the nascent field of digital trade. The project will also analyze the limitations of CIL and its relationship with formal treaties. Finally, it will consider the challenges and opportunities for CIL in a rapidly changing global economic landscape.

Understanding Customary International Law

Unlike codified laws within national systems, CIL is an unwritten body of rules derived from two key elements: consistent state practice and opinio juris. State practice refers to the actions of states, reflecting a general and consistent pattern of behavior. Opinio juris signifies the belief that such practice is followed out of a sense of legal obligation, not mere convenience. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in its Statute (Article 38(1)) recognizes CIL as a primary source of international law alongside treaties.[1]

The process of customary rule formation is organic and often takes time. States engage in repetitive practices, and over time, a consensus emerges regarding their legal character. For example, the principle of freedom of the seas, a cornerstone of international maritime law, evolved through centuries of state practice reflecting the recognition of the high seas as open to all nations.[2] However, pinpointing the exact moment a customary rule emerges can be challenging. This ambiguity can lead to disputes between states regarding the existence and content of specific CIL norms.

The Evolution of Customary International Law

The evolution of CIL is not static. It adapts to changing circumstances and the needs of the international community. Several factors can contribute to the development of new customary rules:

  • State Practice: Consistent and widespread state practice over time is the bedrock of customary rule formation. For instance, the practice of states exchanging diplomatic missions and granting immunity to diplomats has solidified the customary principle of diplomatic immunity.[3]
  • Opinio Juris: This element ensures that states engage in a particular practice not merely out of convenience but out of a sense of legal obligation. Evidence of opinio juris can be gleaned from pronouncements by governments, judicial decisions, and resolutions of international organizations.[4]
  • The Passage of Time: The time it takes for a customary rule to crystallize varies depending on the specific rule and the surrounding circumstances. However, a prolonged period of consistent practice strengthens the claim of a customary norm.[5]

CIL and International Economic Relations

CIL plays a vital role in shaping economic relations among nations across several key areas. Here's a closer look at its impact:

  • Trade: CIL principles like non-discrimination (most-favored-nation treatment and national treatment) underpin the international trading system. These norms ensure that nations treat trading partners equally, fostering a level playing field. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor, the World Trade Organization (WTO), while formal treaties, draw heavily on these customary principles.[6]
  • Investment: CIL establishes the framework for the treatment of foreign investment. The principle of state responsibility for the treatment of aliens ensures that governments provide a minimum standard of protection to foreign investors. This principle has been further elaborated through customary rules on expropriation, requiring compensation for the taking of foreign property without due process.[7]
  • Dispute Settlement: CIL principles like good faith and pacta sunt servanda (agreements must be kept) underpin the framework for resolving international economic disputes. States are obligated to settle disputes peacefully and to comply with binding decisions of international tribunals.[8]
  • Digital Trade: The rise of digital trade presents new challenges for CIL. Existing principles like non-discrimination and freedom of transit may need adaptation to address issues like data flows and cross-border electronic commerce. The evolving state practice and pronouncements by international organizations in this area will be crucial in determining whether new customary norms emerge to govern this dynamic field.[9]

Limitations of Customary International Law

While a valuable tool, CIL has limitations. Its unwritten nature can lead to ambiguity and disagreement about the content and scope of specific rules. Here's a closer look at some key limitations:

  • Ambiguity: The absence of a formal codification process can create uncertainty about the precise content of a customary rule. This ambiguity can lead to disputes between states regarding the application of a particular norm.[10]
  • Slow Pace of Development: The slow pace of customary rule formation may struggle to keep pace with the rapid evolution of the global economy. For instance, the rise of digital trade raises questions about the applicability of existing CIL principles in this new realm.[11]
  • Enforcement Challenges: The lack of a centralized enforcement mechanism for CIL can pose challenges. While states have obligations to comply with customary rules, there is no international body with the authority to directly enforce them.[12]

The Interplay Between CIL and Treaties

Formal treaties play a significant role alongside CIL in shaping economic relations. Treaties can codify existing customary rules, providing greater clarity and certainty. Conversely, treaty practice can contribute to the formation of new customary rules. Here's a breakdown of this interplay:

  • Codification of Customary Rules: Treaties can codify existing customary rules, providing a clearer and more readily enforceable framework. For instance, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) codified customary rules on treaty formation, interpretation, and termination.[13]
  • Treaty Practice and Customary Law: Conversely, widespread participation in and consistent application of specific treaty provisions can contribute to the development of new customary rules. For instance, numerous bilateral investment treaties (BITs) have enshrined similar protections for foreign investors, potentially solidifying the principle of non-discrimination in investment law as a norm of customary international law.[14]

The Future of CIL in the Global Economy

The future of CIL in the global economy hinges on its ability to adapt and evolve. Here are some ways CIL can navigate the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century:

  • State Practice and International Organizations: Mechanisms like state practice combined with pronouncements by international organizations and arbitral tribunals can contribute to the development of new customary rules addressing contemporary economic challenges. For instance, the International Law Commission (ILC) of the United Nations plays a crucial role in codifying and clarifying customary law.[15]
  • Codification in Multilateral Treaties: Greater efforts to codify existing CIL principles in multilateral treaties could provide much-needed clarity and enforcement mechanisms. This would require careful negotiation and compromise among states, but the potential benefits for predictability and stability in the global economy are significant.[16]
  • The Role of Emerging Powers: The rise of emerging powers like China and India will undoubtedly influence the future of CIL. Their state practice and participation in international organizations will play a significant role in shaping the evolution of customary rules in the economic sphere.[17]

 

 

Case Example

The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited Case (Belgium v. Spain) (1970) I.C.J. Rep. 3 illustrates the application of customary international law in investment disputes. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) affirmed the principle of state responsibility for the treatment of aliens, including the requirement to provide fair and equitable treatment (FET) to foreign investors. This case established a significant customary rule that underpins the protection of foreign investments and shapes contemporary international investment law.[18]”

The Role of the International Law Commission (ILC)

The International Law Commission (ILC) is a vital body within the United Nations system that plays a crucial role in the codification and clarification of customary international law. The ILC undertakes scholarly studies on various topics of international law, eventually culminating in the drafting of codifications that can be adopted by states as multilateral treaties. For instance, the ILC's work on the law of international trade law and the law of transboundary resources has significantly contributed to the development of a more comprehensive framework governing these aspects of international economic relations.[19]

Challenges and the Future of CIL

While CIL serves as a foundational pillar for international economic relations, it is not without its challenges. One key challenge lies in the enforcement of customary norms. Unlike formal treaties, there is no centralized enforcement mechanism for CIL. This can create uncertainty and hinder compliance. Additionally, the need to accommodate the diverse state practices of a constantly evolving international community can pose challenges in determining the existence and content of specific customary rules.[20]

However, CIL also possesses inherent strengths that position it well to address the complexities of the global economy in the 21st century. Its adaptability and flexibility allow it to evolve alongside changing realities. Ongoing dialogue and cooperation among states, international organizations, and scholars can play a vital role in ensuring that CIL remains a relevant and adaptable tool for governing the global economy. By addressing the challenges of enforcement and fostering a shared understanding of customary norms, the international community can strengthen CIL's role in promoting stability and predictability in international economic relations.

Conclusion

Customary international law (CIL) serves as a cornerstone of the legal framework governing economic relations among nations. It provides a foundation for trade, investment, dispute settlement, and even the emerging field of digital trade. While limitations exist, CIL's capacity to adapt and evolve alongside formal treaties positions it as a crucial tool for navigating the complexities of the global economy in the 21st century. The ongoing interplay between state practice, pronouncements by international organizations, and the codification efforts of bodies like the ILC will shape the future of CIL in a rapidly changing world.

Further Research

This research project has provided a broad overview of the role of CIL in shaping economic relations among nations. Further research could delve deeper into specific areas, such as:

  • The impact of technological advancements on the development of customary rules in digital trade.([21])
  • The role of regional economic integration agreements in shaping customary norms.([22])
  • The challenges and opportunities for CIL in addressing issues like climate change and global inequality.([23])

Footnotes

  1. M.N. Shaw, International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 152.
  2. American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law Third: Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 464 (1987).
  3. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands), [1969] I.C.J. Rep. 4.
  4. Payam Akhavan, "Becoming Customary International Law," Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 98 (2004): 83-99.
  5. Ibid.
  6. WTO, Understanding the WTO (2023), https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/tif_e.htm
  7. See Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited Case (Belgium v. Spain) (1970) I.C.J. Rep. 3.
  8. James Crawford, The International Law Commission (Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 182.
  9. See UNCTAD, The Digital Economy and Trade: Opportunities and Challenges (2019).
  10. See supra note 4.
  11. Ibid.
  12. Ibid.
  13. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, opened for signature May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331.
  14. See supra note 4.
  15. Supra note 8.
  16. Ibid.
  17. Ibid.
  18. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited Case (Belgium v. Spain) (1970) I.C.J. Rep. 3.
  19. Supra note 8.
  20. Supra note 4.
  21. UNCTAD, The Digital Economy and Trade: Opportunities and Challenges (2019).
  22. See for instance, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) https://www.apec.org/ and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) https://can-mex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/index.aspx?lang=eng

See for instance, The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) https://unfccc.int/ and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

in ​
Impact of Cyberspace on Human Rights and Democracy